<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">Rea Press</journal-id>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">null</journal-id>
      <journal-title>Rea Press</journal-title><issn pub-type="ppub">3042-1322</issn><issn pub-type="epub">3042-1322</issn><publisher>
      	<publisher-name>Rea Press</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.48314/ramd.v1i1.29</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
          <subject>Research Article</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group><subject>Water, Water pollution, Water quality, Assessment methods, Traditional water assessment</subject></subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>A study on traditional water quality assessment methods</article-title><subtitle>A study on traditional water quality assessment methods</subtitle></title-group>
      <contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author">
	<name name-style="western">
	<surname>Babatunde</surname>
		<given-names>Abiodun </given-names>
	</name>
	<aff>Research and Public Policy, University of Lagos, Nigeria</aff>
	</contrib></contrib-group>		
      <pub-date pub-type="ppub">
        <month>07</month>
        <year>2024</year>
      </pub-date>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <day>13</day>
        <month>07</month>
        <year>2024</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>1</volume>
      <issue>1</issue>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>© 2024 Rea Press</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2024</copyright-year>
        <license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/"><p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</p></license>
      </permissions>
      <related-article related-article-type="companion" vol="2" page="e235" id="RA1" ext-link-type="pmc">
			<article-title>A study on traditional water quality assessment methods</article-title>
      </related-article>
	  <abstract abstract-type="toc">
		<p>
			Water quality has been damaged in countries with abundant water resources. They often have significant pollution levels in the rivers. The three most prevalent anthropogenic activities are industrial regions, sewage, agriculture, and animal husbandry. Water pollution can also result from natural calamities like floods and the illegal disposal of chemical waste. Water pollution harms human health, the environment, society, the economy, and wildlife. Hence, water quality assessment is crucial for reducing challenges associated with or caused by water pollution. This study delved into reviewing different traditional water quality assessment methods to identify the most advantageous one. The traditional water quality assessment methods are the single-factor assessment method, numerous pollution index, comprehensive pollution index method, principle component analysis, fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method, and water quality identification index. The strengths and weaknesses of all these methods were examined, and it was discovered that the water quality identification index would be more plausible; however, it is costly.
		</p>
		</abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body></body>
  <back>
    <ack>
      <p>null</p>
    </ack>
  </back>
</article>