Analyzing ESG Barriers Using Neutrosophic Delphi-Dematel Model

Authors

  • Phi-Hung Nguyen * Research Center of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Business, FPT University, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3372-8287
  • Lan-Anh Thi Nguyen Research Center of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Business, FPT University, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam.
  • Tra-Giang Vu Research Center of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Business, FPT University, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam.
  • Le-Thi Ho Research Center of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Business, FPT University, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam.
  • Phuong-Thao Thi Cao Research Center of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Business, FPT University, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam.
  • Huong-Giang Le Hoang Research Center of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Business, FPT University, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam.

https://doi.org/10.48314/ramd.v2i3.73

Abstract

The growing global emphasis on Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) practices has placed increasing pressure on emerging economies, including Vietnam, to integrate sustainability into key industries such as logistics. However, ESG implementation in Vietnam’s logistics sector faces numerous interrelated challenges. This study employs a two-staged Neutrosophic Delphi-DEMATEL (NS-Delphi and NS-DEMATEL) method to systematically identify and analyze the causal relationships among eight key barrier dimensions: Legal and Compliance, Institutional, Economic, Psychological and Behavioral, Environmental, Social, Governance, and Technological. The results reveal that Legal and Compliance, Institutional, Economic, and Psychological, and Behavioral barriers serve as the core causal dimensions that significantly influence the remaining effect dimensions. Notably, weak legal enforcement, unclear regulatory mandates, institutional capacity limitations, financial constraints, and behavioral inertia were the most influential impediments to ESG adoption. In contrast, environmental degradation, poor stakeholder engagement, governance inefficiencies, and low technological uptake were identified as outcome variables shaped by upstream barriers. The study offers practical policy implications, including the need for mandatory ESG regulations, enforcement reforms, capacity building, and targeted green finance mechanisms. Managerial recommendations include conducting ESG audits, aligning sustainability strategies with business objectives, and enhancing ESG-related competencies across organizations. The study contributes to ESG literature by providing a causal framework tailored to emerging market contexts and highlights directions for future research, including comparative analysis and hybrid multi-criteria modeling.

Keywords:

ESG, Sustainable logistics, Vietnam, Neutrosophic sets, NS-Delphi, NS-DEMATEL, Causal analysis

References

  1. [1] Chopra, S., & Meindl, P. (2019). Supply chain management. Strategy, planning & operation. In Das summa summarum des management: DIE 25 wichtigsten werke fur strategie, fuhrung and veranderung (pp. 265–275). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-9320-5_22
  2. [2] Elkington, J. (25AD). years ago I coined the phrase “triple bottom line.” Here’s why it’s time to rethink it. Harvard business review, 25(2–5), 6. https://hbr.org/2018/06/25-years-ago-i-coined-the-phrase-triple-bottom-line-heres-why-im-giving-up-on-it
  3. [3] Hofmann, E., & Rüsch, M. (2017). Industry 4.0 and the current status as well as future prospects on logistics. Computers in industry, 89, 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2017.04.002
  4. [4] Carter, C. R., & Rogers, D. S. (2008). A framework of sustainable supply chain management: moving toward new theory. International journal of physical distribution & logistics management, 38(5), 360–387. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600030810882816
  5. [5] McKinsey. (2024). ESG framework. https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/strategy-and-corporate-finance/our-insights/five-ways-that-esg-creates-value?
  6. [6] Mof. (2024). Tin bộ tài chính. https://mof.gov.vn/webcenter/portal/btcvn/pages_r/l/tin-bo-tai-chinh?dDocName=MOFUCM279461
  7. [7] VLR. (2024). Part 3: Opportunities and challenges for vietnam’s logistics industry in the digital transformation era. https://vlr.vn/part-3-opportunities-and-challenges-for-vietnam-s-logistics-industry-in-the-digital-transformation-era-19777.html
  8. [8] Carole Switzer. (2025). Navigating the current landscape for global businesses|LinkedIn. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/eu-esg-regulations-2024-navigating-current-landscape-global-switzer-zdghc/
  9. [9] Diendandoanhnghiep. (2025). Vietnam needs more than 700 billion USD to address green transformation challenges. https://diendandoanhnghiep.vn/viet-nam-can-hon-700-ty-usd-xu-ly-thach-thuc-chuyen-doi-xanh-10021957.html
  10. [10] Binh, N. T., Anh, L. T., Thao, T. T., & Truc, L. T. (2023). Barriers affecting the development of logistics systems in Vietnam in the period 2015-2021. Journal of science and technology issue on information and communications technology, 75–82. https://doi.org/10.31130/ud-jst.2023.399E
  11. [11] Broumi, S., Bakali, A., & Bahnasse, A. (2018). Neutrosophic sets: An overview. Infinite study, 410(1), 397-428. https://books.google.nl/books
  12. [12] Smarandache, F. (2005). Neutrosophic set-a generalization of the intuitionistic fuzzy set. International journal of pure and applied mathematics, 24(3), 1-29. https://fs.unm.edu/IFS-generalized.pdf
  13. [13] Voskoglou, M. G. (2023). An application of neutrosophic sets to decision making. Infinite Study. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=nsvlEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA65&dq=%5B13%5D+%09Voskoglou,+M.+G.+(2023).+An+application+of+neutrosophic+sets+to+decision+making.+Infinite+Study.&ots=E-UqJ6w1mp&sig=16OfEQHMR6K_6K17P9QSLUzMSio
  14. [14] Abdel-Basset, M., Manogaran, G., Gamal, A., & Smarandache, F. (2018). A hybrid approach of neutrosophic sets and DEMATEL method for developing supplier selection criteria. Design automation for embedded systems, 22(3), 257–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10617-018-9203-6
  15. [15] Atanassov, K. T. (1986). Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy sets and systems. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(86)80034-3
  16. [16] Nguyen, P. H., Nguyen, L. A. T., Pham, H. A. T., Nguyen, T. H. T., Vu, T. G. (2024). Assessing cybersecurity risks and prioritizing top strategies In Vietnam’s finance and banking system using strategic decision-making models-based neutrosophic sets and Z number. Heliyon, 10(19). https://www.cell.com/heliyon/fulltext/S2405-8440(24)13924-2
  17. [17] Alkan, N., & Kahraman, C. (2023). Continuous intuitionistic fuzzy sets (CINFUS) and their AHP&TOPSIS extension: Research proposals evaluation for grant funding. Applied soft computing, 145, 110579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2023.110579
  18. [18] Garg, H. (2021). A new possibility degree measure for interval-valued q-rung orthopair fuzzy sets in decision-making. International journal of intelligent systems, 36(1), 526–557. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.22308
  19. [19] Tripathi, S., & Gupta, M. (2021). Identification of challenges and their solution for smart supply chains in Industry 4.0 scenario: a neutrosophic DEMATEL approach. International journal of logistics systems and management, 40(1), 70–94. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJLSM.2021.117691
  20. [20] Akarsh C, B. S. (2025). Barriers to green logistics in India. https://www.jardcs.org/abstract.php?id=1593
  21. [21] WTO-FTA. (2025). Outstanding opportunities for Vietnam to become regional logistics centre. https://wtocenter.vn/chuyen-de/24732-outstanding-opportunities-for-vietnam-to-become-regional-logistics-centre
  22. [22] Bffinternational. (2025). The environmental impact of freight transportation-BFF international. https://bffinternational.net/en/the-environmental-impact-of-freight-transportation/
  23. [23] Enemuo, M., & Ogunmodimu, O. (2025). Transitioning the mining sector: A review of renewable energy integration and carbon footprint reduction strategies. Applied energy, 384, 125484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.125484
  24. [24] Cau, L. N., & Satoh, H. (2007). The existing urban environmental sanitation system in hanoi and problems related. International forum on water environmental governance in asia: technologies and institutional systems for water environmental governance (pp. 14–15). https://wepa-db.net/archive/pdf/0703forum/paper26.pdf
  25. [25] Vir. (2025). ESG poses challenges for Vietnamese businesses in global trade expansion. https://vir.com.vn/esg-poses-challenges-for-vietnamese-businesses-in-global-trade-expansion-110908.html
  26. [26] Vir. (2025). Vietnam’s logistics sector hardest hit by Typhoon Yagi. https://vir.com.vn/vietnams-logistics-sector-hardest-hit-by-typhoon-yagi-114502.html&link=autochanger
  27. [27] Conditions, factory working. (2025). Working Conditions in Vietnam - Factory Working Conditions. https://factoryworkingconditions.com/countries/working-conditions-in-vietnam/
  28. [28] Vietnam, P. (2012). From Ambition to Impact Vietnam ESG Readiness Report 2022 IN COLLABORATION WITH. https://www.pwc.com/vn/en/publications/2022/pwc-vietnam-esg-readiness-2022-en.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com
  29. [29] Arc. (2025). Navigating ESG Trends in Vietnam: Progress and challenges. https://arc-group.com/esg-trends-vietnam/
  30. [30] Maruichi, D., & Abe, M. (2019). Corruption and the business environment in Vietnam: Implications from an empirical study. Asia and the pacific policy studies, 6(2), 222–245. https://doi.org/10.1002/app5.275
  31. [31] Ha, N. T. T., Nguyen, T. C., & Ho, N. T. B. (2024). The impact of environmental, social and governance disclosure on stock prices: Empirical research in Vietnam. Heliyon, 10(19), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38757
  32. [32] B-company. (n.d.). Vietnam electric vehicle (EV) Car Market: Current Landscape and Future Outlook-B-Company. https://b-company.jp/vietnam-electric-vehicle-ev-car-market-current-landscape-and-future-outlook
  33. [33] News, viet nam. (2025). Nearly 85 per cent of FDI enterprises use outdated technology. https://vietnamnews.vn/economy/1532864/nearly-85-per-cent-of-fdi-enterprises-use-outdated-technology.html
  34. [34] Sahu, H. (2025). The vietnam IoT cloud market: Growth, opportunities, and future trends. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/vietnam-iot-cloud-market-growth-opportunities-future-trends-sahu-fymje/
  35. [35] Wfw. (2025). The future of EV charging infrastructure: Spotlight on vietnam-watson farley & Williams. https://www.wfw.com/articles/the-future-of-ev-charging-infrastructure-spotlight-on-vietnam
  36. [36] Trinh, V. D. (2024). Vietnam’s struggle with cyber security. East Asia forum, march (Vol. 24). https://eastasiaforum.org/2024/03/20/vietnams-struggle-with-cyber-security/
  37. [37] Van. (2025). Vietnamese businesses lack awareness and understanding of ESG practices. https://van.nongnghiepmoitruong.vn/vietnamese-businesses-lack-awareness-and-understanding-of-esg-practices-d400611.html
  38. [38] Chen, W., Xie, Y., & He, K. (2024). Environmental, social, and governance performance and corporate innovation novelty. International journal of innovation studies, 8(2), 109–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijis.2024.01.003
  39. [39] Trinh, A. (2024). Adapting European union sustainable corporate governance regulations for Vietnam: A comparative policy analysis [Thesis]. https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2024061753329
  40. [40] Smith, H. (2024). Renewable energy integration in sustainable transportation and Logistics. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/382116674
  41. [41] Wardani, S. A., Handayani, N. U., & Wibowo, M. A. (2022). Barriers for implementing reverse logistics in the construction sectors. Journal of industrial engineering and management, 15(3), 385–415. https://doi.org/10.3926/jiem.3539
  42. [42] Adebisi, J., Olasunbo, O., Denwigwe, I. H., Nwachukwu, P. A., & others. (2023). A review of environmental, social and governance frameworks in sustainable disposal of waste from renewable energy resources. Journal of digital food, energy & water systems, 4(2), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.36615/digital_food_energy_water_systems.v4i2.2833
  43. [43] Chhabra, D., & Kr Singh, R. (2024). Analyzing barriers to green logistics in context of Circular Economy and Industry 4.0 in the Indian manufacturing industry. International journal of logistics research and applications, 27(11), 1939–1952. https://doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2022.2134847
  44. [44] Sonar, H., Sarkar, B. D., Joshi, P., Ghag, N., Choubey, V., & Jagtap, S. (2024). Navigating barriers to reverse logistics adoption in circular economy: An integrated approach for sustainable development. Cleaner logistics and supply chain, 12, 100165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clscn.2024.100165
  45. [45] Grondys, K. (2019). The impact of freight transport operations on the level of pollution in cities. Transportation research procedia, 39, 84–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2019.06.010
  46. [46] Kahalimoghadam, M., Thompson, R. G., & Rajabifard, A. (2024). Assessing unsustainable trends in city logistics. Transportation research procedia, 79, 401–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2024.03.053
  47. [47] Er Kara, M., Ghadge, A., & Bititci, U. S. (2021). Modelling the impact of climate change risk on supply chain performance. International journal of production research, 59(24), 7317–7335. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2020.1849844
  48. [48] Rondinelli, D., & Berry, M. (2000). Multimodal transportation, logistics, and the environment: managing interactions in a global economy. European management journal, 18(4), 398–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-2373(00)00029-3
  49. [49] Bhat, B. A., Azad, N. F., Firdous, I., Anees, S. U. M., Khan, S., Islam, Z., … & Ahmad, I. (2024). An empirical study on environmental laws awareness among college students of Kashmir valley. ENGAGEMENT: jurnal pengabdian masyarakat, 3(3), 111–126. https://doi.org/10.58355/engagement.v3i3.114
  50. [50] Waqas, M., Dong, Q., Ahmad, N., Zhu, Y., & Nadeem, M. (2018). Critical barriers to implementation of reverse logistics in the manufacturing industry: a case study of a developing country. Sustainability, 10(11), 4202. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10114202
  51. [51] Zeidyahyaee, N., Shokouhyar, S., Motameni, A., Yazdani-Chamzini, A., Šaparauskas, J., & Turskis, Z. (2024). An integrated model for the exploration and evaluation of the obstacles of sustainable logistics in the manufacturing sector. Journal of competitiveness, 16(2), 154-181. https://www.cjournal.cz/files/535.pdf
  52. [52] Paridhi, Ritika, Arora, H., Arora, P., & Saini, N. (2024). Unlocking the path to sustainability: A hierarchical model for understanding corporate barriers to esg reporting adoption. Journal of risk and financial management, 17(12), 527. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm17120527
  53. [53] Beredugo, M. (2024). Sustainable logistic. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/377384699_Sustainable_logistic#fullTextFileContent [accessed Mar 04 2025
  54. [54] Rahman, T., Ali, S. M., Moktadir, M. A., & Kusi-Sarpong, S. (2020). Evaluating barriers to implementing green supply chain management: An example from an emerging economy. Production planning & control, 31(8), 673–698. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2019.1674939
  55. [55] Leogrande, A., & Degennaro, G. (2024). Integrating ESG principles into smart logistics : Toward sustainable supply chains. SSRN, 1–547. https://hal.science/hal-04784306v1/file/13-11-2024 ESG.pdf
  56. [56] Painuly, J. P. (2001). Barriers to renewable energy penetration; a framework for analysis. Renewable energy, 24(1), 73–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-1481(00)00186-5
  57. [57] Ansari, Z. N., & Kant, R. (2021). A plithogenic based neutrosophic analytic hierarchy process framework to analyse the barriers hindering adoption of eco-innovation practices in supply chain. International journal of sustainable engineering, 14(6), 1509–1524. https://doi.org/10.1080/19397038.2021.1998842
  58. [58] Kazancoglu, I., Sagnak, M., Kumar Mangla, S., & Kazancoglu, Y. (2021). Circular economy and the policy: A framework for improving the corporate environmental management in supply chains. Business strategy and the environment, 30(1), 590–608. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2641
  59. [59] Khayyat, M., Balfaqih, M., Balfaqih, H., & Ismail, M. (2024). Challenges and factors influencing the implementation of green logistics: A case study of Saudi Arabia. Sustainability, 16(13), 5617. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16135617
  60. [60] Pimentel, M., Arantes, A., & Cruz, C. O. (2022). Barriers to the adoption of reverse logistics in the construction industry: A combined ISM and MICMAC approach. Sustainability, 14(23), 15786. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142315786
  61. [61] Bhujbal, D. D., & Shafighi, N. (2022). Green logistic and sustainable electronic products packaging; consumers perspective. International journal of business and social science research, 3(7–8), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.47742/ijbssr.v3n7p1
  62. [62] Reynolds, S. (2024). Barriers to adopting green supply chain practices: Perspectives from industry leaders. Preprints, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202406.1313.v1
  63. [63] Jefimovaitė, L., & Vienažindienė, M. (2022). Factors Influencing the Application of Green Logistics: Findings From the Lithuanian Logistics Center. Polish journal of management studies, 25(1), 193–212. http://dx.doi.org/10.17512/pjms.2022.25.1.12
  64. [64] Liu, C., Cui, P., Zhao, H., Zhang, Z., Zhu, Y., & Liu, H. (2024). Green finance, economic policy uncertainty, and corporate ESG performance. Sustainability, 16(22), 10141. https://doi.org/10.3390/su162210141
  65. [65] Al-Sarihi, A., & Mansouri, N. (2022). Renewable energy development in the Gulf cooperation council countries: Status, barriers, and policy options. Energies, 15(5), 1923. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15051923
  66. [66] Mathiyazhagan, K., Govindan, K., NoorulHaq, A., & Geng, Y. (2013). An ISM approach for the barrier analysis in implementing green supply chain management. Journal of cleaner production, 47, 283–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.10.042
  67. [67] Kumar, D. (2024). Tackling greenwashing in global environment, social and governance reporting: A legal and technical perspective on corporate accountability. Social and governance reporting: a legal and technical perspective on corporate accountability. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4981149
  68. [68] Lee, H. S., Tzeng, G. H., Yeih, W., Wang, Y. J., & Yang, S.-C. (2013). Revised DEMATEL: resolving the infeasibility of DEMATEL. Applied mathematical modelling, 37(10–11), 6746–6757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2013.01.016
  69. [69] Bouzon, M., Govindan, K., Rodriguez, C. M. T., & Campos, L. M. S. (2016). Identification and analysis of reverse logistics barriers using fuzzy Delphi method and AHP. Resources, conservation and recycling, 108, 182–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.021
  70. [70] Le, T. N., Phan, Q. H., Nguyen, P. H., & Nguyen, L. A. T. (2025). Rethinking reverse logistics: Neutrosophic strategies for warehouse management challenges. Neutrosophic sets and systems, 81(1), 7. https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nss_journal/vol81/iss1/7/
  71. [71] U-Dominic, C. M., Orji, I. J., & Okwu, M. (2021). Analyzing the barriers to reverse logistics (RL) implementation: A hybrid model based on IF-DEMATEL-EDAS. Sustainability, 13(19), 10876. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910876
  72. [72] Prajapati, H., Kant, R., & Shankar, R. (2019). Prioritizing the solutions of reverse logistics implementation to mitigate its barriers: A hybrid modified SWARA and WASPAS approach. Journal of cleaner production, 240, 118219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118219
  73. [73] Liu, F., Aiwu, G., Lukovac, V., & Vukic, M. (2018). A multicriteria model for the selection of the transport service provider: A single valued neutrosophic DEMATEL multicriteria model. Decision making: applications in management and engineering, 1(2), 121–130. https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame1802128l
  74. [74] Mishra, A. R., & Rani, P. (2021). Assessment of sustainable third party reverse logistic provider using the single-valued neutrosophic combined compromise solution framework. Cleaner and responsible consumption, 2, 100011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clrc.2021.100011
  75. [75] Ji, P., Wang, J., & Zhang, H. (2018). Frank prioritized Bonferroni mean operator with single-valued neutrosophic sets and its application in selecting third-party logistics providers. Neural computing and applications, 30(3), 799–823. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-016-2660-6
  76. [76] de Freitas, A. C., Do Nascimento, L. A., de Castro, R. G., Motokane, M. T., & Reis, P. (2023). Biodiversity and citizenship in an argumentative socioscientific process. Sustainability, 15(4), 2987. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15042987
  77. [77] Bhutani, K., Gaur, S., Panwar, P., & Garg, S. (2023). A neutrosophic cognitive maps approach for pestle analysis in food industry. International conference on emerging trends in expert applications & security (pp. 349-360). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-1909-3_30
  78. [78] Yazdani, M., Torkayesh, A. E., Stević, Ž., Chatterjee, P., Ahari, S. A., & Hernandez, V. D. (2021). An interval valued neutrosophic decision-making structure for sustainable supplier selection. Expert systems with applications, 183, 115354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115354
  79. [79] Görçün, Ö. F., Aytekin, A., & Korucuk, S. (2023). Fresh food supplier selection for global retail chains via bipolar neutrosophic methodology. Journal of cleaner production, 419, 138156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138156
  80. [80] Ye, J. (2015). Multiple-attribute decision-making method under a single-valued neutrosophic hesitant fuzzy environment. Journal of intelligent systems, 24(1), 23–36. https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jisys-2014-0001/html
  81. [81] Mondal, B., Garai, A., Mukhopadhyay, A., & Majumder, S. K. (2021). Inventory policies for seasonal items with logistic-growth demand rate under fully permissible delay in payment: a neutrosophic optimization approach. Soft computing, 25(5), 3725–3750. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-020-05402-9
  82. [82] Lu, L., & Luo, X. (2020). Emergency Transportation Problem Based on Single-Valued Neutrosophic Set. Discrete dynamics in nature and society, 2020(1), 4813497. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/4813497
  83. [83] Kamran, M., Salamat, N., Jana, C., & Xin, Q. (2025). Decision-making technique with neutrosophic Z-rough set approach for sustainable industry evaluation using sine trigonometric operators. Applied soft computing, 169, 112539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2024.112539
  84. [84] Jafarzadeh Ghoushchi, S., Shaffiee Haghshenas, S., Memarpour Ghiaci, A., Guido, G., & Vitale, A. (2023). Road safety assessment and risks prioritization using an integrated SWARA and MARCOS approach under spherical fuzzy environment. Neural computing and applications, 35(6), 4549–4567. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-022-07929-4
  85. [85] Nguyen, P. H., Nguyen, L. A. T., Vu, T. G., Vu, D.-M., Nguyen, T. H. T., Le, H.-Q., … others. (2025). Mapping Barriers to Sustainable Fashion Consumption: Insights from Neutrosophic-Z Number and Delphi-DEMATEL Integration. Neutrosophic sets and systems, 80, 749–788. https://fs.unm.edu/nss8/index.php/111/article/download/5783/2394
  86. [86] Nguyen, P. H., Nguyen, L. A. T., Le, H. Q., Nguyen, T. H. T., Vu, T. G., Le, H. G. H., & others. (2025). Optimizing Horizontal Collaboration in Logistics with Neutrosophic Z-Number Decision Models. Neutrosophic sets and systems, 81, 306–342. https://fs.unm.edu/nss8/index.php/111/article/download/5832/2414
  87. [87] Hsu, B.-X., & Chen, Y.-M. (2024). Does corporate social responsibility influence performance persistence? A signal extraction approach with evidence from Fortune 500 companies. Technological forecasting and social change, 200, 123154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.123154
  88. [88] Rau, P. R., & Yu, T. (2024). A survey on ESG: investors, institutions and firms. China finance review international, 14(1), 3–33. https://doi.org/10.1108/CFRI-12-2022-0260
  89. [89] Barko, T., Cremers, M., & Renneboog, L. (2022). Shareholder engagement on environmental, social, and governance performance. Journal of business ethics, 180(2), 777–812. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04850-z
  90. [90] Liu, T.-K. (2024). ESG, corporate social responsibility and business effectiveness in Taiwan’s banking industry: Cost and risk perspectives. Asian economic and financial review, 14(1), 12–28. https://doi.org/10.55493/5002.v14i1.4938
  91. [91] Probert, A. (2022). Lack of standardized ESG reporting system biggest threat to effective ESG disclosures.
  92. [92] Nguyen, P. H., Nguyen, L. A. T., Le, H. Q., & Tran, L. C. (2024). Navigating critical barriers for green bond markets using A fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model: Case study in Vietnam. Heliyon, 10(13). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33493
  93. [93] Jonsdottir, B., Sigurjonsson, T. O., Johannsdottir, L., & Wendt, S. (2022). Barriers to using ESG data for investment decisions. Sustainability, 14(9), 5157. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095157
  94. [94] Liou, J. J. H., Liu, P. Y. L., & Huang, S. W. (2023). Exploring the key barriers to ESG adoption in enterprises. Systems and soft computing, 5, 200066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sasc.2023.200066
  95. [95] Bosi, M. K., Lajuni, N., Wellfren, A. C., & Lim, T. S. (2022). Sustainability reporting through environmental, social, and governance: A bibliometric review. Sustainability, 14(19), 12071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100136
  96. [96] Nguyen, P.-H., Nguyen, L.-A. T., Pham, H.-A. T., & Pham, M.-A. T. (2023). Breaking ground in ESG assessment: integrated DEA and MCDM framework with spherical fuzzy sets for Vietnam’s wire and cable sector. Journal of open innovation: technology, market, and complexity, 9(3), 100136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100136
  97. [97] Singhania, M., Saini, N., Shri, C., & Bhatia, S. (2024). Cross-country comparative trend analysis in ESG regulatory framework across developed and developing nations. Management of environmental quality: an international journal, 35(1), 61–100. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-02-2023-0056
  98. [98] Khamisu, M. S., Paluri, R. A., & Sonwaney, V. (2024). Environmental social and governance (ESG) disclosure motives for environmentally sensitive industry: an emerging economy perspective. Cogent business & management, 11(1), 2322027. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2322027
  99. [99] Singhania, M., & Saini, N. (2022). Systems approach to environment, social and governance (ESG): Case of Reliance industries. Sustainable operations and computers, 3, 103–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2021.11.003
  100. [100] Deschryver, P., & De Mariz, F. (2020). What future for the green bond market? How can policymakers, companies, and investors unlock the potential of the green bond market? Journal of risk and financial management, 13(3), 61. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm13030061
  101. [101] Gillan, S. L., Koch, A., & Starks, L. T. (2021). Firms and social responsibility: A review of ESG and CSR research in corporate finance. Journal of corporate finance, 66, 101889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.101889
  102. [102] Yeow, K. E., & Ng, S.-H. (2021). The impact of green bonds on corporate environmental and financial performance. Managerial finance, 47(10), 1486–1510. https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-09-2020-0481
  103. [103] Worldbank.org. (2023). What You Need to Know About IFC’s Green Bonds. https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2021/12/08/what-you-need-to-know-about-ifc-s-green-bonds
  104. [104] OECD. (2016). Green bonds: Country experiences, barriers and options. https://www.cbd.int/financial/greenbonds/oecd-greenbondscountries2016.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com
  105. [105] Hu, Y., & Zhang, X. (2024). The impact of ESG on management tone: Empirical evidence from China. In Forum for Economic and Financial Studies (Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 1276-1276). https://doi.org/10.59400/fefs.v2i1.1276
  106. [106] Romano, A. L., Ferreira, L. M. D. F., & Caeiro, S. S. F. S. (2023). Why companies adopt supply chain sustainability practices: A study of companies in Brazil. Journal of cleaner production, 433, 139725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139725
  107. [107] Li, C., Tang, W., Liang, F., & Wang, Z. (2024). The impact of climate change on corporate ESG performance: The role of resource misallocation in enterprises. Journal of cleaner production, 445, 141263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141263
  108. [108] He, F., Ding, C., Yue, W., & Liu, G. (2023). ESG performance and corporate risk-taking: Evidence from China. International review of financial analysis, 87, 102550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102550
  109. [109] Gangi, F., Varrone, N., Daniele, L. M., & Coscia, M. (2022). Mainstreaming socially responsible investment: do environmental, social and governance ratings of investment funds converge? Journal of cleaner production, 353, 131684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131684
  110. [110] Díaz, V., Ibrushi, D., & Zhao, J. (2021). Reconsidering systematic factors during the Covid-19 pandemic – The rising importance of ESG. Finance research letters, 38, 101870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101870
  111. [111] Marzouki, A., Chouaibi, J., & Amara, T. (2024). Do business ethics moderate corporate corruption risk-ESG reporting relationship? Evidence from European ESG firms. International journal of ethics and systems, 40(4), 734–758. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOES-07-2023-0166
  112. [112] DasGupta, R., & Roy, A. (2023). Firm environmental, social, governance and financial performance relationship contradictions: Insights from institutional environment mediation. Technological forecasting and social change, 189, 122341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122341
  113. [113] Qi, Y., Han, M., & Zhang, C. (2024). The synergistic effects of digital technology application and ESG performance on corporate performance. Finance research letters, 61, 105007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.105007
  114. [114] Asif, M., Searcy, C., & Castka, P. (2023). ESG and Industry 5.0: The role of technologies in enhancing ESG disclosure. Technological forecasting and social change, 195, 122806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122806

Downloads

Published

2025-09-22

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): Risk Assessment and Management Decisions (RAMD)

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Nguyen, P.-H. ., Nguyen, L.-A. T. ., Vu, T.-G. ., Ho, L.-T. ., Cao, P.-T. T. ., & Hoang, H.-G. L. . (2025). Analyzing ESG Barriers Using Neutrosophic Delphi-Dematel Model. Risk Assessment and Management Decisions, 2(3), 209-243. https://doi.org/10.48314/ramd.v2i3.73

Similar Articles

11-20 of 30

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.