Fuzzy and Neutrosophic Multi-Criteria Risk Management

Authors

  • Takaaki Fujita * Independent Researcher, Tokyo, Japan.

https://doi.org/10.48314/ramd.v2i4.74

Abstract

Risk Management is the process of identifying, assessing, and mitigating potential losses to minimize
the impact on organizational objectives[1, 2]. Fuzzy risk management uses fuzzy sets to represent vague
likelihood and impact, then ranks and mitigates risks under imprecise information. Neutrosophic risk
management models each risk with truth, indeterminacy, and falsity degrees, enabling decisions when
data are conflicting or incomplete. In this paper, we define Multi-Criteria Risk Management, Fuzzy
Multi-Criteria Risk Management, and Neutrosophic Multi-Criteria Risk Management, and we investigate
their fundamental properties. In future work, we expect that domain experts will evaluate and validate
the proposed models and concepts.

Keywords:

Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Risk Management, Multi-Criteria Risk Management, Fuzzy Set, Neutrosophic Multi-Criteria Risk Management, Neutrosophic Set

References

  1. [1] Power, M. (2004). The risk management of everything. The Journal of Risk Finance, 5(3):58–65.
  2. [2] https://doi.org/10.1108/eb023001
  3. [3] René M Stulz. (2004). Rethinking risk management. In Corporate risk management, pages 87–120. Columbia University Press.
  4. [4] https://doi.org/10.1111/jacf.12486
  5. [5] Takaaki Fujita, Arif Mehmood, and Arkan A Ghaib. A reconsideration note of the mathematical frameworks for fuzzy and
  6. [6] neutrosophic risk management. Management Science Advances, 2(1):223–238, 2025. https://doi.org/10.31181/msa21202523
  7. [7] Farnad Nasirzadeh, Abbas Afshar, Mostafa Khanzadi, and Susan Howick. Integrating system dynamics and fuzzy logic modelling
  8. [8] for construction risk management. Construction management and economics, 26(11):1197–1212, 2008.
  9. [9] https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190802459924
  10. [10] P Zlateva, D Velev, and L Raeva. A fuzzy logic method for assessment of risk management capability. International Journal of
  11. [11] Innovation, Management and Technology, 6(4):260, 2015.
  12. [12] https://www.academia.edu/download/111878877/2b9931264c56808c2bc53c6d8ef55a178784.pdf
  13. [13] Lotfi A Zadeh. Fuzzy sets. Information and control, 8(3):338–353, 1965.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
  14. [14] Haibin Wang, Florentin Smarandache, Yanqing Zhang, and Rajshekhar Sunderraman. Single valued neutrosophic sets. Infinite
  15. [15] study, 2010. https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Single_Valued_Neutrosophic_Sets/-F8NEQAAQBAJ?hl=en
  16. [16] Said Broumi, Mohamed Talea, Assia Bakali, and Florentin Smarandache. Single valued neutrosophic graphs. Journal of New
  17. [17] theory, 10:86–101, 2016. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/jnt/article/381241
  18. [18] Said Broumi, Mohamed Talea, Assia Bakali, and Florentin Smarandache. Interval valued neutrosophic graphs. Critical Review,
  19. [19] XII, 2016:5–33, 2016. https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Collected_Papers_Volume_VI/1WKjEAAAQBAJ?
  20. [20] hl=en&gbpv=0
  21. [21] Florentin Smarandache. A unifying field in logics: Neutrosophic logic. In Philosophy, pages 1–141. American Research Press,
  22. [22] https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.49174
  23. [23] Noura Metawa and Nahia Mourad. Neutrosophic-based multi-objectives model for financial risk management. International
  24. [24] Journal of Neutrosophic Science (IJNS), 19(1), 2022. https://doi.org/10.54216/IJNS.190114
  25. [25] Abdullah Ali Salamai. A robust neutrosophic model for risk management in livestock supply chains: A case study towards
  26. [26] sustainable practices. Neutrosophic Sets and Systems, 78:191–205,
  27. [27] https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Neutrosophic_Sets_and_Systems_vol_78_202/fjM_EQAAQBAJ?
  28. [28] hl=en&gbpv=0
  29. [29] Muhammad Junaid, Ye Xue, Muzzammil Wasim Syed, Ji Zu Li, and Muhammad Ziaullah. A neutrosophic ahp and topsis
  30. [30] framework for supply chain risk assessment in automotive industry of pakistan. Sustainability, 12(1):154, 2019.
  31. [31] https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010154
  32. [32] Boris Yatsalo, Sergey Gritsyuk, Terry Sullivan, Benjamin Trump, and Igor Linkov. Multi-criteria risk management with the use
  33. [33] of decernsmcda: Methods and case studies. Environment Systems and Decisions, 36(3):266–276, 2016.
  34. [34] https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-016-9598-1
  35. [35] Boris Yatsalo, Terry Sullivan, Vladimir Didenko, Sergey Gritsuk, Alexander Tkachuk, Oleg Mireabasov, Valeria Slipenkaya,
  36. [36] Irina Pichugina, and Igor Linkov. Environmental risk management with the use of multi-criteria spatial decision support system
  37. [37] decerns. International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management, 16(4):175–198, 2012.
  38. [38] https://doi.org/10.1504/IJRAM.2012.051254
  39. [39] B Yatsalo, V Didenko, S Gritsyuk, O Mirzeabasov, A Babutski, and I Pichugina. The use of multi-criteria spatial decision
  40. [40] support system decerns for risk management and land-use planning. In Proceedings of the VII-th Moscow International
  41. [41] Conference on Operations research (ORM-2013), Moscow, volume 1, pages 110–112, 2013.
  42. [42] https://www.academia.edu/download/51744749/The_use_of_multi-criteria_spatial_decisi20170211-17151-1pitxjp.pdf
  43. [43] Zoubida Benmamoun, Khaoula Khlie, Vernika Agarwal, Ikhlef Jebbor, Chandan Kumar Jha, and Hany El Kadi. A multicriteria
  44. [44] risk management model for agri-food industrial companies. Environment, Development and Sustainability, pages 1–22, 2025.
  45. [45] https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-025-06584-8
  46. [46] Florentin Smarandache. Plithogenic set, an extension of crisp, fuzzy, intuitionistic fuzzy, and neutrosophic sets-revisited.
  47. [47] Infinite study, 2018.18. https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/
  48. [48] Plithogenic_Set_an_Extension_of_Crisp_Fu/6lXVDwAAQBAJ?hl=en
  49. [49] Fazeelat Sultana, Muhammad Gulistan, Mumtaz Ali, Naveed Yaqoob, Muhammad Khan, Tabasam Rashid, and Tauseef Ahmed.
  50. [50] A study of plithogenic graphs: applications in spreading coronavirus disease (covid-19) globally. Journal of ambient intelligence
  51. [51] and humanized computing, 14(10):13139–13159, 2023.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-022-03772-6
  52. [52] Lin Wei. An integrated decision-making framework for blended teaching quality evaluation in college english courses based on
  53. [53] the double-valued neutrosophic sets. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., 45:3259–3266, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-224389
  54. [54] Takaaki Fujita and Florentin Smarandache. A unified framework for u-structures and functorial structure: Managing super,
  55. [55] hyper, superhyper, tree, and forest uncertain over/under/off models. Neutrosophic Sets and Systems, 91:337–380, 2025.
  56. [56] https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/A_Unified_Framework_for_U_Structures_and/riSIEQAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=0
  57. [57] Takaaki Fujita and Florentin Smarandache. A Dynamic Survey of Fuzzy, Intuitionistic Fuzzy, Neutrosophic, Plithogenic, and
  58. [58] Extensional Sets. Neutrosophic Science International Association (NSIA), 2025. https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/A_-
  59. [59] Dynamic_Survey_of_Fuzzy_Intuitionistic/dGahEQAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=0
  60. [60] Jiarong Jia. Triple-valued neutrosophic off for public digital cultural service level evaluation in craft and art museums.
  61. [61] Neutrosophic Sets and Systems, 88(1):44, 2025. https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3563&context=
  62. [62] nss_journal

Downloads

Published

2025-12-07

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): Risk Assessment and Management Decisions (RAMD)

Section

Articles

Categories

How to Cite

Fujita, T. (2025). Fuzzy and Neutrosophic Multi-Criteria Risk Management. Risk Assessment and Management Decisions, 2(4), 254-265. https://doi.org/10.48314/ramd.v2i4.74

Similar Articles

11-20 of 32

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.