Assessing the Impact of Radioactive Contamination in Groundwater and Environmental Quality: A Comparative Study of Remediation Technique

Authors

  • Imoh Ime Ekanem * Department of Mechanical Engineering, Akwa Ibom State, Polytechnic, Nigeria. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8973-9260
  • Michael Okon Bassey Department of Mechatronics Engineering, Akwa Ibom State Polytechnic, Nigeria.
  • Aniekan Essienubong Ikpe Department of Mechanical Engineering, Akwa Ibom State Polytechnic, Ikot Osurua, Ikot Ekpene, Nigeria.

https://doi.org/10.48314/ramd.v1i2.39

Abstract

Radioactive contamination is a pressing environmental issue that requires effective remediation techniques. Chemical and biological remediation methods have been proposed as potential solutions, but their comparative effectiveness remains unclear. This study seeks to address this gap by comparing the efficacy of these two remediation techniques in reducing radioactive contamination. The study involved a comprehensive review of existing literature on chemical and biological remediation techniques for radioactive contamination. The advantages and limitations of each technique was analyzed and their effectiveness in reducing radioactive contamination compared. Additionally, the practical application of these techniques in a real-world scenario were evaluated based on online data. The findings revealed that both chemical and biological remediation techniques have shown promise in reducing radioactive contamination. Chemical techniques, such as ion exchange and precipitation were observed as effective techniques in removing radioactive contaminants from soil and water. On the other hand, biological techniques, such as phytoremediation and microbial remediation, offer a sustainable and cost-effective approach to remediate radioactive contamination. However, the effectiveness of these techniques may vary depending on the specific characteristics of the contaminated site. Therefore, the he choice of remediation technique should be based on the specific characteristics of the contaminated site and the desired outcome. Based on our findings, a holistic approach that combines both chemical and biological remediation techniques to effectively address radioactive contamination is recommended. Furthermore, future research should focus on developing integrated remediation strategies that leverage the strengths of both techniques to achieve optimal results.

Keywords:

Radioactive contamination, Groundwater, Environmental quality, Remediation techniques, Nuclear contamination

References

  1. [1] Rajkhowa, S., Sarma, J., & Das, A. R. (2021). Radiological contaminants in water: Pollution, health risk, and treatment. In Contamination of water: Health risk assessment and treatment strategies (pp. 217–236). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-824058-8.00013-X
  2. [2] Suresh, S., Rangaswamy, D. R., Srinivasa, E., & Sannappa, J. (2020). Measurement of radon concentration in drinking water and natural radioactivity in soil and their radiological hazards. Journal of radiation research and applied sciences, 13(1), 12–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16878507.2019.1693175
  3. [3] Manawi, Y., Hassan, A., Atieh, M. A., & Lawler, J. (2024). Overview of radon gas in groundwater around the world: Health effects and treatment technologies. Journal of environmental management, 368, 122176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122176
  4. [4] Talapko, J., Talapko, D., Katalinić, D., Kotris, I., Erić, I., Belić, D., … & Škrlec, I. (2024). Health effects of ionizing radiation on the human body. Medicina (Lithuania), 60(4), 653. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60040653
  5. [5] Adebiyi, F. M., Ore, O. T., Adeola, A. O., Durodola, S. S., Akeremale, O. F., Olubodun, K. O., & Akeremale, O. K. (2021). Occurrence and remediation of naturally occurring radioactive materials in Nigeria: A review. Environmental chemistry letters, 19(4), 3243–3262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-021-01237-4
  6. [6] Dinis, M. de L., & Fiúza, A. (2021). Mitigation of uranium mining impacts—a review on groundwater remediation technologies. Geosciences, 11(6), 250. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences11060250
  7. [7] Dobrzyńska, M. M., Gajowik, A., & Wieprzowski, K. (2023). Radon–occurrence and impact on the health. Roczniki panstwowego zakladu higieny/annals of the national institute of hygiene, 74(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.32394/rpzh.2023.0242
  8. [8] Missimer, T. M., Teaf, C., Maliva, R. G., Danley-Thomson, A., Covert, D., & Hegy, M. (2019). Natural radiation in the rocks, soils, and groundwater of southern florida with a discussion on potential health impacts. International journal of environmental research and public health, 16(10), 1793. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16101793
  9. [9] Fasasi, M. K., Tchokossa, P., Ojo, J. O., & Balogun, F. A. (1999). Occurrence of natural radionuclides and fallout cesium-137 in dry-season agricultural land of South Western Nigeria. Journal of radioanalytical and nuclear chemistry, 240(3), 949–952. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02349880
  10. [10] Sopapan, P., Lamdab, U., Akharawutchayanon, T., Issarapanacheewin, S., Yubonmhat, K., Silpradit, W., ... & Prasertchiewchan, N. (2023). Effective removal of non-radioactive and radioactive cesium from wastewater generated by washing treatment of contaminated steel ash. Nuclear engineering and technology, 55(2), 516–522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2022.10.007
  11. [11] Rai, H., & Kawabata, M. (2020). The dynamics of radio-cesium in soils and mechanism of cesium uptake into higher plants: newly elucidated mechanism of cesium uptake into rice plants. Frontiers in plant science, 11, 528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2022.10.007
  12. [12] Bjørklund, G., Semenova, Y., Pivina, L., Dadar, M., Rahman, M. M., Aaseth, J., & Chirumbolo, S. (2020). Uranium in drinking water: A public health threat. Archives of toxicology, 94(5), 1551–1560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-020-02676-8
  13. [13] Smičiklas, I., & Šljivić-Ivanović, M. (2016). Radioactive contamination of the soil: Assessments of pollutants mobility with implication to remediation strategies. Soil Contamination–current consequences and further solutions, 253–276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-020-02676-8
  14. [14] Romanchuk, A. Y., Vlasova, I. E., & Kalmykov, S. N. (2020). Speciation of uranium and plutonium from nuclear legacy sites to the environment: A mini review. Frontiers in chemistry, 8, 630. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2020.00630
  15. [15] Li, P., Karunanidhi, D., Subramani, T., & Srinivasamoorthy, K. (2021). Sources and consequences of groundwater contamination. Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology, 80(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-020-00805-z
  16. [16] Cowart, J. B., & Burnett, W. C. (1994). The distribution of uranium and thorium decay-series radionuclides in the environment—a review. Journal of environmental quality, 23(4), 651–662. https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/?skip=true
  17. [17] Taylor, P. A. (2015). Physical, chemical, and biological treatment of groundwater at contaminated nuclear and NORM sites. In Environmental remediation and restoration of contaminated nuclear and norm sites (pp. 237–256). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-78242-231-0.00010-7
  18. [18] Brusseau, M. L., & Artiola, J. F. (2019). Chemical contaminants. In Environmental and pollution science (pp. 175–190). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-814719-1.00012-4
  19. [19] Mohan, M., Jyothy, S., Cherian, N., Augustine, T., Sreedharan, K., Gopikrishna, V. G., & others. (2016). Ecotoxicology and monitoring of toxic pollutants in the marine environment-a review. International journal of marine science, 6(9). http://dx.doi.org/10.5376/ijms.2016.06.0009
  20. [20] Hiranmai, R. Y., & Kamaraj, M. (2023). Occurrence, fate, and toxicity of emerging contaminants in a diverse ecosystem. Physical sciences reviews, 8(9), 2219–2242. https://doi.org/10.1515/psr-2021-0054
  21. [21] Laraia, M. (2015). Radioactive contamination and other environmental impacts of waste from nuclear and conventional power plants, medical and other industrial sources. In Environmental remediation and restoration of contaminated nuclear and norm sites (pp. 35–56). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-78242-231-0.00002-8
  22. [22] Jayasanka, D. J., Komatsuzaki, M., Hoshino, Y., Seki, H., & Moqbal, M. I. (2016). Nutrient status in composts and changes in radioactive cesium following the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident. Sustainability, 8(12), 1332. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8121332
  23. [23] Hatra, G. (2018). Radioactive pollution: an overview. The holistic approach to environment, 8(2), 48–65. https://hrcak.srce.hr/202085
  24. [24] Sharma, S. D. (2024). Radiation environment in medical facilities. In handbook on radiation environment, volume 2 (pp. 303–345). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78450-0_10
  25. [25] Srivastava, R. R., Pathak, P., & Perween, M. (2020). Environmental and health impact due to uranium mining. Uranium in plants and the environment, 69–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14961-1_3
  26. [26] Chaturvedi, A., & Jain, V. (2019). Effect of ionizing radiation on human health. International journal of plant and environment, 5(03), 200–205. https://ijplantenviro.com/index.php/IJPE/article/download/1100/725
  27. [27] Burgio, E., Piscitelli, P., & Migliore, L. (2018). Ionizing radiation and human health: reviewing models of exposure and mechanisms of cellular damage: An epigenetic perspective. International journal of environmental research and public health, 15(9), 1971. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15091971
  28. [28] Abu Hasan, H., Muhammad, M. H., & Ismail, N. I. (2020). A review of biological drinking water treatment technologies for contaminants removal from polluted water resources. Journal of water process engineering, 33, 101035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2019.101035
  29. [29] Gavrilescu, M. (2021). Water, soil, and plants interactions in a threatened environment. Water, 13(19), 2746. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13192746
  30. [30] Stefanakis, A. I., Zouzias, D., & Marsellos, A. (2015). Groundwater pollution: Human and natural sources and risks. Environmental science and engineering, 4(10), 82–102.
  31. [31] Adeola, A. O., Iwuozor, K. O., Akpomie, K. G., Adegoke, K. A., Oyedotun, K. O., Ighalo, J. O., … & Conradie, J. (2023). Advances in the management of radioactive wastes and radionuclide contamination in environmental compartments: A review. Environmental geochemistry and health, 45(6), 2663–2689. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-022-01378-7
  32. [32] Sellin, P., & Leupin, O. X. (2014). The use of clay as an engineered barrier in radioactive-waste management - a review. Clays and clay minerals, 61(6), 477–498. https://doi.org/10.1346/CCMN.2013.0610601
  33. [33] Pearlman, L. (1999). Subsurface containment and monitoring systems: barriers and beyond. National network of environmental management studies fellow for us environmental protection agency, (3), 1–61. https://www.cluin.org/download/studentpapers/pearlman.pdf
  34. [34] Mulligan, C. N., Yong, R. N., & Gibbs, B. F. (2001). Remediation technologies for metal-contaminated soils and groundwater: An evaluation. Engineering geology, 60(1–4), 193–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7952(00)00101-0
  35. [35] Liu, L., Li, W., Song, W., & Guo, M. (2018). Remediation techniques for heavy metal-contaminated soils: Principles and applicability. Science of the total environment, 633, 206–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.161
  36. [36] Eberhard Falck, W. (2006). Remediation of sites with mixed contamination of radioactive and other hazardous substances. International atomic energy agency. https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/TRS442_web.pdf
  37. [37] Iv, E. S. B., Hodo, W. D., Peters, J. F., Myers, T. E., Olsen, R. S., & Sharp, M. K. (2008). Assessment of the effectiveness of clay soil covers as engineered barriers in waste disposal facilities with emphasis on modeling cracking behavior. Geotechnical and Structures Laboratory (US). https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Michael-Sharp-4/publication/235060553
  38. [38] Gemail, K. S., & Abd-Elaty, I. (2024). Unveiling the hidden depths: A review for understanding and managing groundwater contamination in arid regions. In Handbook of environmental chemistry (Vol. 126, pp. 3–35). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/698_2023_1049
  39. [39] Singh, R., Chakma, S., & Birke, V. (2023). Performance of field-scale permeable reactive barriers: An overview on potentials and possible implications for in-situ groundwater remediation applications. Science of the total environment, 858, 158838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158838
  40. [40] Thiruvenkatachari, R., Vigneswaran, S., & Naidu, R. (2008). Permeable reactive barrier for groundwater remediation. Journal of industrial and engineering chemistry, 14(2), 145–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2007.10.001
  41. [41] Cao, B., Xu, J., Wang, F., Zhang, Y., & O’connor, D. (2021). Vertical barriers for land contamination containment: A review. International journal of environmental research and public health, 18(23), 12643. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182312643
  42. [42] Brandl, H. (2021). Vertical barriers for municipal and hazardous waste containment. In Developments in geotechnical engineering (pp. 301–334). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003211013-26
  43. [43] Budania, R., & Dangayach, S. (2023). A comprehensive review on permeable reactive barrier for the remediation of groundwater contamination. Journal of environmental management, 332, 117343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117343
  44. [44] Sakr, M., El Agamawi, H., Klammler, H., & Mohamed, M. M. (2023). A review on the use of permeable reactive barriers as an effective technique for groundwater remediation. Groundwater for sustainable development, 21, 100914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2023.100914
  45. [45] Madzin, Z., Mohd Kusin, F., Shakirin Zahar, M., & Nurjaliah Muhammad, S. (2016). Passive in situ remediation using permeable reactive barrier for groundwater treatment. Pertanika journal of scholarly research reviews (PJSRR), 2(2), 1–11. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/234560203.pdf
  46. [46] Abatenh, E., Gizaw, B., Tsegaye, Z., & Wassie, M. (2017). The role of microorganisms in bioremediation-a review. Open journal of environmental biology, 2(1), 38–46. https://www.agriscigroup.us/articles/OJEB-2-107.php
  47. [47] Kaur, G., Kaur, D., & Gupta, S. (2021). The role of microorganisms in remediation of environmental contaminants. In Environmental pollution and remediation (pp. 421–450). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5499-5_15
  48. [48] Bala, S., Garg, D., Thirumalesh, B. V., Sharma, M., Sridhar, K., Inbaraj, B. S., & Tripathi, M. (2022). Recent strategies for bioremediation of emerging pollutants: A review for a green and sustainable environment. Toxics, 10(8), 484. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics10080484
  49. [49] Yadav, K. K., Singh, J. K., Gupta, N., & Kumar, V. (2017). A review of nanobioremediation technologies for environmental cleanup: A novel biological approach. Journal of materials and environmental science, 8(2), 740–757. http://www.jmaterenvironsci.com/Document/vol8/vol8_N2/78-JMES-2831-Yadav.pdf
  50. [50] Yoon, I. H., Park, C. W., Kim, I., Yang, H. M., Kim, S. M., & Kim, J. H. (2021). Characteristic and remediation of radioactive soil in nuclear facility sites: A critical review. Environmental science and pollution research, 28(48), 67990–68005. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16782-2
  51. [51] Jantzen, C. M., Lee, W. E., & Ojovan, M. I. (2013). Radioactive waste (RAW) conditioning, immobilization, and encapsulation processes and technologies: Overview and advances. Radioactive waste management and contaminated site clean-up, 171–272. https://doi.org/10.1533/9780857097446.1.171
  52. [52] Shaulis, L. (1996). Review of encapsulation technologies. Water resources center, desert research institute, university and community college system of nevada. https://www.osti.gov/biblio/459878
  53. [53] Thakare, M., Sarma, H., Datar, S., Roy, A., Pawar, P., Gupta, K., … & Prasad, R. (2021). Understanding the holistic approach to plant-microbe remediation technologies for removing heavy metals and radionuclides from soil. Current research in biotechnology, 3, 84–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crbiot.2021.02.004
  54. [54] Kumar, M., Bolan, N., Jasemizad, T., Padhye, L. P., Sridharan, S., Singh, L., … & Rinklebe, J. (2022). Mobilization of contaminants: Potential for soil remediation and unintended consequences. Science of the total environment, 839, 156373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156373
  55. [55] Niu, A., & Lin, C. (2021). Managing soils of environmental significance: A critical review. Journal of hazardous materials, 417, 125990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125990
  56. [56] Sinha, D., Datta, S., Mishra, R., Agarwal, P., Kumari, T., Adeyemi, S. B., … & Chen, J. T. (2023). Negative impacts of arsenic on plants and mitigation strategies. Plants, 12(9), 1815. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12091815
  57. [57] Ma, Y., Liu, Z., Xu, Y., Zhou, S., Wu, Y., Wang, J., … & Shi, Y. (2018). Remediating potentially toxic metal and organic co-contamination of soil by combining in situ solidification/stabilization and chemical oxidation: efficacy, mechanism, and evaluation. International journal of environmental research and public health, 15(11), 2595. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15112595
  58. [58] Yan, L., Le, Q. Van, Sonne, C., Yang, Y., Yang, H., Gu, H., … & Peng, W. (2021). Phytoremediation of radionuclides in soil, sediments and water. Journal of hazardous materials, 407, 124771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124771
  59. [59] Bhalara, P. D., Punetha, D., & Balasubramanian, K. (2014). A review of potential remediation techniques for uranium (VI) ion retrieval from contaminated aqueous environment. Journal of environmental chemical engineering, 2(3), 1621–1634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2014.06.007
  60. [60] İnan, S. (2022). Inorganic ion exchangers for strontium removal from radioactive waste : a review. Journal of radioanalytical and nuclear chemistry, 331(3), 1137–1154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-022-08206-3
  61. [61] Padhye, L. P., Srivastava, P., Jasemizad, T., Bolan, S., Hou, D., Shaheen, S. M., … & Bolan, N. (2023). Contaminant containment for sustainable remediation of persistent contaminants in soil and groundwater. Journal of hazardous materials, 455, 131575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.131575
  62. [62] Houlihan, M. F., Berman, M. H., Wang, J., & Tollefsrud, E. J. (2016). Remediation of contaminated groundwater. In The handbook of groundwater engineering (pp. 1035–1072). CRC Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20516-4_17
  63. [63] Al-Hashimi, O., Hashim, K., Loffill, E., Marolt Čebašek, T., Nakouti, I., Faisal, A. A. H., & Al-Ansari, N. (2021). A comprehensive review for groundwater contamination and remediation: Occurrence, migration and adsorption modelling. Molecules, 26(19), 5913. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26195913
  64. [64] Sharma, S., Singh, B., & Manchanda, V. K. (2015). Phytoremediation: role of terrestrial plants and aquatic macrophytes in the remediation of radionuclides and heavy metal contaminated soil and water. Environmental science and pollution research, 22(2), 946–962. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3635-8
  65. [65] Ramadas, M., & Samantaray, A. K. (2018). Applications of remote sensing and GIS in water quality monitoring and remediation: A state-of-the-art review. In Energy, environment, and sustainability (pp. 225–246). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7551-3_13
  66. [66] Chowdhury, A., Jlia, M. K., & Machinal, D. (2003). Application of remote sensing and gis in groundwater studies: An overview [presentation]. Ground water pollution: Proceedings of the international conference on water and environment (we-2003) (p. 39). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260990310_Application_of_remote_sensing_and_GIS_in_groundwater_studies_An_overview
  67. [67] Vidonish, J. E., Zygourakis, K., Masiello, C. A., Sabadell, G., & Alvarez, P. J. J. (2016). Thermal treatment of hydrocarbon-impacted soils: A review of technology innovation for sustainable remediation. Engineering, 2(4), 426–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENG.2016.04.005
  68. [68] Quina, M. J., Bordado, J. C., & Quinta-Ferreira, R. M. (2008). Treatment and use of air pollution control residues from MSW incineration: An overview. Waste management, 28(11), 2097–2121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2007.08.030
  69. [69] Sanito, R. C., Bernuy-Zumaeta, M., You, S. J., & Wang, Y. F. (2022). A review on vitrification technologies of hazardous waste. Journal of environmental management, 316, 115243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115243
  70. [70] Zhao, C., Dong, Y., Feng, Y., Li, Y., & Dong, Y. (2019). Thermal desorption for remediation of contaminated soil: A review. Chemosphere, 221, 841–855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115243
  71. [71] Tandon, P. K., & Singh, S. B. (2016). Redox processes in water remediation. Environmental chemistry letters, 14(1), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-015-0540-4
  72. [72] Cundy, A. B., Hopkinson, L., & Whitby, R. L. D. (2008). Use of iron-based technologies in contaminated land and groundwater remediation: A review. Science of the total environment, 400(1–3), 42–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.07.002
  73. [73] Borch, T., Kretzschmar, R., Skappler, A., Van Cappellen, P., Ginder-Vogel, M., Voegelin, A., & Campbell, K. (2010). Biogeochemical redox processes and their impact on contaminant dynamics. Environmental science and technology, 44(1), 15–23. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/es9026248
  74. [74] Faisal, A. A. H., Sulaymon, A. H., & Khaliefa, Q. M. (2018). A review of permeable reactive barrier as passive sustainable technology for groundwater remediation. International journal of environmental science and technology, 15(5), 1123–1138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-017-1466-0

Downloads

Published

2024-12-12

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): Risk Assessment and Management Decisions (RAMD)

Section

Articles

Categories

How to Cite

Ime Ekanem, I., Okon Bassey, M., & Essienubong Ikpe, A. (2024). Assessing the Impact of Radioactive Contamination in Groundwater and Environmental Quality: A Comparative Study of Remediation Technique. Risk Assessment and Management Decisions, 1(2), 209-226. https://doi.org/10.48314/ramd.v1i2.39

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.